Westport in Brief!

EverythingWestport.com

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Photos | EverythingWestport.com

 

Tax Collector to offer excise tax optional paperless billing; new fees for on-line payment.

 

School Building Committee, comparing two very different school building designs, now needs to select one to move forward.

 

 

Tax Collector to offer excise tax optional paperless billing; new fees for on-line payment.

Motor Vehicle Excise bills were recently mailed and have a due date of Tuesday, April 18, 2017.

EverythingWestport.com

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

 

Motor Vehicle Excise bills were recently mailed and have a due date of Tuesday, April 18, 2017.

* * * The Town Hall is closed Friday, April 14th and Monday, April 17th. * * *

 

Taxpayers may make payments at the office, by mail or online. There was a green notice enclosed with the new bills advising they have changed their online bill payment vendor to City Hall Systems for tax payments.

* * * This new system is now on-line as of 3/22/2017 * * *

If you choose to pay online, you'll have to sign up.  Prior users will receive an email from the new system with an announcement of the change and how to sign up. 

 

Taxpayers may sign up by visiting the town's website at www.westport-ma.com and clicking on Pay Taxes Online.  Follow the instructions from there. 

 

This new system has a fee of 50 cents per shopping cart for payments made by checking or savings accounts; the old system was 35 cents per bill. 

 

Payments made by credit card or debit card are charged 2.95% ($1 minimum) of the amount charged. 

 

This system will also allow customers to sign up for paperless billing, which is voluntary.

 

Auto pay will also be available.  Any questions regarding setting up an account or finding your bills online, call City Hall Systems at 508.381.5455.

Any excise bill needing an abatement (adjustment) due to cancelling a plate or switching plates to a new vehicle is done through the assessors’ office.  Your cancelled plate receipt is required, and a new registration is needed if plate was switched to another vehicle. 

 

All bills are due by April 18, 2017. Please plan accordingly.

Carol A. Borden
Tax Collector

 

 

 

School Building Committee, comparing two very different school building designs, now needs to select one to move forward.

Architectural firm reduces costs in effort to win bid.

EverythingWestport.com

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Photos | EverythingWestport.com

 

By Robert Barboza 

Special Correspondent to EverythingWestport.com

 

Having reviewed presentations from two architectural firms at their Wednesday, March 22nd meeting, the Westport School Building Committee must now decide between sticking with the custom-designed plans for a combined middle/high school developed over the past year, or going with a new “model school” design that could save the town several million dollars.

 

Owner’s Project Manager (OPM) Dan Tavares gave the building committee a spreadsheet comparing the potential costs of the two plans after the presentations were done, indicating that a switch to the model school design could lower project costs by $4 to $6 million dollars.

 

Inset: OPM Dan Tavares is guiding the School Building Committee through the perilous waters of procuring a new school building.

 

The building committee agreed to meet again on Wednesday, March 29th to further discuss the two options.

 

MSBA-offered Model School

Most of the savings would be generated by increased reimbursement incentives offered the town by the Mass. School Building Authority (MSBA), a cap on architect’s fees that could save more than a million dollars, and a shortened construction time which could eliminate some inflationary cost increases, Tavares indicated.

 

Above: Longmeadow High School offered up to the town of Westport as a Model school alternative by the MSBA.

OMR Architect photo.

 

On the negative side, the L-shaped design of the model school plans used to build the Longmeadow High School in 2011 would be harder to fit on the Old County Road site of the closed Westport Middle School chosen as the location for the new school facility being planned.

 

The model school footprint would eliminate a number of athletic fields the building committee would like to see included in the final plans for the site, and many of the building committee members see that as a major drawback to the alternative design being considered.

 

Inset: OMR Architects project manager Jeanne Roberts brought a team of a half dozen designers, job managers, and landscaping consultants along for the presentation

.

 OMR Architects project manager Jeanne Roberts brought a team of a half dozen designers, job managers, and landscaping consultants along for the presentation, outlining the advantages of using the model school design they had developed for the Longmeadow High School project. With minor modifications to the plans, Roberts said the design could easily be adapted to fit Westport’s needs for a “co-located” middle school and high school.

 

The major advantages to the model school plans are lower soft costs and higher MSBA reimbursements, an accelerated timetable for construction, and a design which has been proven to be effective. She also noted that the building layout allows the academic spaces to be easily closed off to allow the auditorium, cafeteria and gymnasium spaces to be used in the evening and on weekends for community events.

 

The model plan calls for the middle school academic spaces to be located on the ground floor of the two-story structure, with high school classes located on the second floor. There is only a few hundred more square feet of space in the model school plan than the locally-developed design, but the building’s footprint would permit only a baseball field, softball field, and four tennis courts on the site. 

 

By comparison, the custom-designed local alternative has a more compact footprint that would permit the construction of baseball and softball diamonds, field hockey and soccer fields, and a practice field in addition to the four tennis courts which would be displaced by the new construction.

 

OMR principal designer Leigh Sherwood noted that “there are many ways to customize the academic spaces to fit Westport’s needs.” However, any major modifications to the model school design, or materials used, would result in additional charges, Roberts indicated.

 

The Longwood school was built at a cost of $47.48 million in 2011, and when adjusted for inflation to today’s construction costs, would likely come in at between $60 million and $65 million. Adding soft costs and the $8.5 million estimated for the demolition of the closed middle school, the total project costs were estimated at $76 million to $81 million, not including the extra $2-3 million expected for a larger gymnasium and walking track the building committee is considering as a result of community input on the plans.

 

If put out to bid in 2018, Roberts estimated that total project costs would probably come in between $78 million and $83 million. Town meeting approval of the project in the fall of 2017 would allow the project to go out to bid in the spring of 2018, and allow construction to start in June 2018, she suggested.

 

Candidate for selectman in the April town election Brian Valcourt was the first audience member to question how the reduced number of playing fields would impact school athletic programs, asking if the athletic fields at the current high school campus would be maintained for school use. 

 

Building committee co-chair Dianne Baron said that determination would have to be made by the Westport School Committee once a site plan is finalized. “We will not get reimbursed by the MSBA to reproduce those fields,” she said, noting that residents will want to know what will happen with the high school fields if a new facility is built.

 

Custom-designed school building

Jonathan Levi, the local architect who has been working with the building committee for the past year, suggested there are “some advantages” to continuing with the current project team that helped develop the “preferred option” for a new co-located school facility specifically designed to meet the needs outlined by educators, parents, and other community members.

 

Those special needs incorporated into in the locally-developed design include a television studio, chorus room, child care space, and extra common spaces for project-based learning, he pointed out.

 

Project Based Learning is a teaching method in which students gain

knowledge and skills by working for an extended period of time to investigate and respond to an engaging and complex question, problem, or challenge.

 

The H-shaped building design developed through that local input process has the middle and high school academic spaces clearly separated, but sharing the central “core” facilities such as an auditorium, gymnasium, cafeteria and administrative areas, Levi noted. He termed the proposed facility as “a modest, low-key building that seems right for Westport.”

 

Estimated construction costs came in at about $76 million, including demolition of the old school, with the additional gym space and walking track bringing the building costs to about $78.2 million. Total project costs had been estimated at around $94 million for the local option, but have now been substantially reduced.

 

Inset: Jonathon Levi of JLA shows off the 3D model of his firm’s “preferred solution” for a new Jr/Sr High School building. The Westport resident is incorporating Westport-flavored exterior touches in the design.

 

However, Levi suggested a few alternatives for lowering construction costs; he has already offered to cut architectural fees from 10 percent of building costs to a lesser percentage.

 

Further, his “surprise” suggestion for lowering construction costs was to consider using off-site modular construction for much of the building.

 

That option could lower construction costs between five and 15 percent, and cut some architectural fees in half, Levi said.

 

The architect also suggested using an alternative procurement method called “construction manager at risk” (CMR) which would give the town more control over the building process than hiring a general contractor giving the lowest bid price.

 

Click here to learn more about Construction Manager at Risk.

 

The CMR method also allows the town to require a percentage of the construction work and labor pool to go to local subcontractors, he explained.

 

That method could create up to 250 jobs for area residents, and result in as much as “$13.7 million in economic activity pumped into the local economy,” Levi said. “This is just one approach we can explore together... It would be a little more work, but it might mean considerable savings.”

 

At the end of his presentation, the Westport architect concluded, “The case for a community design and cost control (opportunities) is very clear” when compared to a model school plan.

 

School Building Committee Reactions.

Westport School Committee member Antonio Viveiros was the first to suggest that “OMR’s presentation, with two (athletic) fields, and Jonathan Levi’s presentation with six fields, is a huge difference.” Fellow building committee member Dave Cass agreed that the H-shaped local design was a much better fit for the Old County Road site.

 

Building committee co-chair Tracy Priestner noted that “the JLA design features two separate administrative suites” while the OMR design has just one. She felt that was an important difference in the two designs, and led to a brief discussion of whether a co-located middle and high school might result in a reduction in the number of principals required on the future administrative team.

 

Inset: Co-chair Tracy Priestner has worked hard on the project’s cost, doing due diligence for the Westport taxpayer.

 

At present, with grades 7-12 in the current high school, the administrative team includes one principal and two assistant principals.

 

School Committee Chair Nancy Rioux said that plans for future staffing decisions have not yet been discussed by her board; Tavares noted that decisions on the size of the administration offices will have to be made before a design is finalized.

 

Distributing a comparative spreadsheet of costs for the two options now on the table, Tavares noted that going with a model school design “could have a significant impact” on total project costs even though actual construction costs would be similar with either plan.

 

“It could be four to six million dollars in direct savings to taxpayers... not to mention the (shortened) time,” he said.

 

The owner’s project manager indicated he was surprised with the unexpected suggestion to consider the CMR option for the project raised by Levi, and would need some time to research that management option to see “if it is viable.”

 

The biggest savings with the model school plan would be with architectural and design fees, capped at 4.75 percent by MSBA guidelines, and a one-time MSBA-offered additional reimbursement of five percent, Tavares said.

 

The custom plan’s fees are capped at 10 percent of the project costs, he noted; the difference would be “in the millions” when added to the estimated $100,000 per month in escalated building costs that could be saved with the use of a model plan.

 

Levi has suggested in the past that his architectural and design fees are negotiable, possibly bringing total cost of the two designs considerable closer.

 

Above: Westport residents, who turned out to listen to the two proposals, examine the “preferred solution’s” 3D model.

 

Above: JLA’s proposed “co-located” middle school and high school better separates grades 5-8 from the older high school students, a concern of many parents. The compact design will also adapt to the Middle School’s challenging site layout, including the number of sports fields desired by the community.

 

 

© 2017 Community Events of Westport.  All rights reserved.

EverythingWestport.com